Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20040115054614/http://www.anglicancommunioninstitute.org:80/foa-turner.htm
The End of a Church
And The Triumph of Denominationalism
Or How To Think About What Is Happening In The Episcopal Church
THE WINDSOR REPORT: A "SELF" DEFINING MOMENT FOR ECUSA And The Anglican Communion
The Rev. Dr. Philip Turner
I
The Network's Foundations
The keynote address at the Colorado meeting of the Network of Anglican Communion Dioceses and Parishes, at Christ Church, Denver, on 21 February 2004.
Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20041119032137/http://anglicancommunioninstitute.org:80/articles/appendix4.htm
The Case Against the
Episcopal Church USA:
We write to bring to the attention of the Bishops, Priest, Deacons and Lay Persons of The Episcopal Church (TEC) a matter of grave concern. It is a matter that, left unaddressed in the decision-making of General Convention, now threatens the integrity and public witness of everyone who calls him or herself an Episcopalian: is our church prepared to permit in its midst clergy and lay leaders who, however much they represent a minority opinion, are committed to a traditional reading of TEC's Prayer Book and Constitution?
REFLECTIONS ON KENNETH KEARON'S LETTER TO BISHOP TITO ZAVALA OF THE SOUTHERN CONE The Anglican Communion News Service has posted a notice from the Secretary General of the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) stating that he has written Bishop Tito Zavala who represents the Province of the Southern Cone on the Inter-Anglican Standing Commission on Unity, Faith and Order (IASCUFO). In his letter the Secretary General withdrew Bishop Zavala's membership in that body, but asked him to continue on as a consultant.
THREE LECTURES ON THE CURRENT STATE AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF THE ANGLICAN COMMUNION AND THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
The Rev. Dr. Philip Turner Springfield Ill. February 2009
Lecture Three
What Then Shall We Do?
The current public dispute over the canonical legality of the Episcopal Church's House of Bishops' recent vote to depose Bishops Schofield and Cox amounts at best to a severe embarrassment to the Presiding Bishop, her advisors, and the House itself; at worst, it exposes a travesty of Christian justice and prudence. How was it possible that the process and definition of terms demanded by the canons were not openly examined, discussed, and agreed upon prior to this vote, so as to avoid the prima facie plausible accusations now being made that appropriate consents were not in fact giv
