After the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) 2005
AFTER THE ACC – JUNE 2005
What Has Happened?
The Anglican Communion Institute, Inc.
Grave Concerns over the Diocese of Connecticut
Grave Concerns over the Diocese of Connecticut
A Proposal for Extraordinary Ministry to be Exercised by the Archbishop of Canterbury in Order to Maintain the Highest Degree of Communion Possible in the Life of the Anglican Communion
A PROPOSAL FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY MINISTRY TO BE EXERCISED BY THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE HIGHEST DEGREE OF COMMUNION POSSIBLE IN THE LIFE OF THE ANGLICAN COMMUNION
Drawing the Line - ACI to Lambeth Commission
DRAWING THE LINE
DRAWING THE LINE
A Guide to the Windsor Report 2004
A GUIDE TO THE WINDSOR REPORT
Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20041127163954/http://www.anglicancommunioninstitute.org/
A Call to Life Together: The Choice facing the Episcopal Church--USA, November 2, 2004
A Call to Life Together: The Choice facing the Episcopal Church--USA, November 2, 2004
Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20041127163954/http://www.anglicancommunioninstitute.org/
Statement of the Global South Primates
Statement of the Global South Primates
Anglican Church of Kenya Office, Nairobi, Kenya
Response of Archbishops Emmanuel Kolini and Yong Ping Chung
Response of Archbishops Emmanuel Kolini and Yong Ping Chung
Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20040220060758/http://anglicancommunioninstitute.org:80/koliniandyong040128.htm
January 28, 2004
A Brief Analysis of the Primates’ Statement: Warning, Clarity, and Calling
A Brief Analysis of the Primates’ Statement:
Warning, Clarity, and Calling
Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20031207115025/http://www.anglicancommunioninstitute.org:80/primatestmt.htm
Misrepresenting ACI’s concerns about the constitutionality of supplemental liturgical material
Tobias Haller occupies an important position at General Convention through his role on the Marriage Taskforce. We have engaged Mr. Haller through comments on blogs, and that engagement has yielded interesting information about what he thinks General Convention is legally capable of doing with respect to liturgical revision. We believe his reasoning is flawed on these matters, and we have stated our concerns straightforwardly. More recently, on his own blog, he has attacked these statements of ours as being the product of simple “ignorance”.
